🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and families are watching intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing number of nations are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our kids' childhood". The policy is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "an options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged parliament to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is granted. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a solid foundation," commented a leading MEP driving the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Last year, support grew behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who was lost after encountering harmful social media material contends that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for minors," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is primarily happening at the local level amid national stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra access needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures demanding parental consent for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and calls from various individuals to mimic the Australian path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Beyond these regions, further nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world bodies take a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

As this international debate unfolds, the policies of this nation and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are less and less content to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.